Mukul Rothagi, a senior lawyer in the Supreme Court, who has defended the big parties in the cases that caused a stir in the country, is coming to the Supreme Court to plead the case of actor Siddique, who went on the run in the molestation case. In other words, he is the same person who was released on bail like a flower when Aryan Khan, the son of Bollywood superstar Shahrukh Khan, was arrested in a drunkenness case, and he argued for actor Dileep in the case of assaulting the actress in the Supreme Court. In short, it is clear that Mukul Rothagi is the tamarind horn that actor Siddique, who is now facing a look-out notice and arrest proceedings in the molestation case, is holding to pull out of this case. With this, Idivetta lawyers will appear in the Supreme Court on behalf of actor Siddique, Atijeevta and the state government.
Meanwhile, former Solicitor General Ranjith Kumar is appearing for the state government. When Dileep asked that the witnesses including actress Manju Warrier should not be re-examined in the actress assault case, Adv. It is Ranjith Kumar. It is interesting to note that those who clashed in that case also come face to face in the Siddique case.
Senior advocate Vrinda Grover, who has been fighting for women’s rights for a lifetime, will be present. This woman lawyer fought a legal battle in the Supreme Court to ensure justice for Bilkis Banu, who was gang-raped during the Gujarat riots and witnessed the murders of her daughter.
Now the crucial question is whether Siddique’s lawyer will demand urgent consideration of the anticipatory bail application in this case. This week, the Supreme Court is sitting only tomorrow. If urgent consideration is to be given tomorrow, Chief Justice D.Y. It should be brought to the attention of Chandrachud. List tomorrow only if the Chief Justice is satisfied that the bail application is urgent. Or it is known that new cases will be listed only on next Monday or Friday.
Meanwhile, the actor approached the Supreme Court seeking anticipatory bail. Siddiqui has questioned the High Court observations in the petition. Pratha while examining the allegations against the actor The High Court said that there is an indication that Madrashtya has committed a crime against him. The following observations are made by Siddique Har. Asking G. Har said that he is innocent and has no criminal background. Ji says. Arrest or custodial interrogation required for collection of evidence Millen also points out. Ranjeeta is the daughter of senior advocate Mukul Rothagi. The petition was submitted by Rothagi.
Meanwhile, in the anticipatory bail application filed in the Supreme Court, Siddique said that the rape complaint against him was made an accused without investigation. The actor alleges that the infighting between star organizations AMMA and WCC is behind the harassment complaint against him.
The complainant had made allegations against him many times in the past on social media. It was never said that he was raped. There was a delay of eight years in filing the complaint. The allegations are contradictory. It is unbelievable that the complaint was delayed due to fear. In a letter handed over to the Supreme Court registry, Siddique’s lawyer also demanded that the anticipatory bail plea be considered on Monday.
He is a senior citizen of 65 years. The grandchild is part of the family. Willing to fully cooperate with the investigation. But the police is proceeding with the measures to arrest him. Therefore, the letter also demands that the anticipatory bail petition be considered urgently. Senior advocate Mukul Rohtaggi appeared for Siddique in the Supreme Court.
